Free Government Cell Phones

Lifeline phone service provides free cell phones to America's financially disadvantaged

Menu
  • Home
  • How to Qualify
  • How to get one
  • States
  • Providers
  • FAQ
  • News
  • Top-Up
  • Earn Money

Exposing the Washington Times unfair attack on the free government cell phone program

October 30, 2014

If such an award existed, the Washington Times would surely win this year’s award for Creativity in Reporting. Unfortunately, reporter Luke Rosiak’s recent Times article attacked Lifeline, the free government cell phone program, with accusations so shrill and so inaccurate that they leapfrog beyond bias and dive straight into the realm of dogma with a dollop of sensationalism thrown in for good measure.

The Times article is headlined “Companies get $9/mo per Obamaphone from feds while offering to public for $7.”

Is that true? In a word, no. We hardly know where to begin correcting the inaccuracies, distortions and outright falsehoods contained in this article. Rosiak writes:

TracFone Wireless, the largest Obamaphone vendor, receives more than $9 per line from the federal government for each phone it distributes to the poor, but sells similar service to the general public for less than $7.

That short, one-sentence paragraph is the heart of Rosiak’s argument. Unfortunately, it is inaccurate — unless Rosiak’s definition of “similar” service is very different than ours. Let’s just take a look at a side-by-side comparison of the company’s Lifeline plan and its non-Lifeline plans. (To clarify some murky writing in the Times article, TracFone is the parent company of Safelink Wireless, which is the actual company that competes in the Lifeline Assistance market. It’s a subtle but important distinction that was overlooked in the Times article.)

Lifeline Non-Lifeline
Free Monthly Minutes 250 180
Free Monthly Texts 1000 180
Free Monthly Data — 180 mb
Cost of cell phone Free $79.99
Cost per month $9.25* $7**
Contract required None 90 days

* Monthly fee paid to TracFone (Safelink Wireless) for each Lifeline free government cell phone account
**Monthly fee paid to TracFone by individuals who do not qualify for Lifeline

This quick comparison clearly indicates that the entire premise of the Washington Times article is false.

The free Lifeline plan far exceeds what it offers to the general public for approximately $7 per month. Specifically, the plan for which the government pays $9.25 per month offers nearly 40% more minutes per month and more than five times as many texts per month. (We feel obliged to point out that those extra 820 texts per month offered in Safelink’s Lifeline plan are incredibly significant, because a huge percentage of interpersonal communications now take place via texting.) It’s true that the TracFone plan doesn’t offer a monthly data plan, but considering that its non-Lifeline plan offers only 180 megabytes per month, enough to view approximately five web pages per day, we consider that difference to be truly insignificant.

Now let’s take a look at the cost of the cell phones you receive with the two plans:

TracFone’s Lifeline plan provides qualifying customers with a free cell phone. Please allow us to repeat that for the benefit of Mr. Rosiak: the Lifeline cell phone is free. Absolutely free.

On the other hand, the cell phones available to customers who opt for the $7 per month plan range from $69.99 to $129.99. To make that difference even clearer, the least expensive $69.99 cell phones are sold out on the TracFone website. That means that their cheapest cell phones available actually cost $79.99.

The level and number of services offered by TracFone (and most other Lifeline Assistance companies) is rapidly expanding across the country. They are adding more and more minutes and texts to their plans all the time. For example, Assurance Wireless now offers unlimited texts and unlimited calling in California. It’s a very competitive business and we expect other Lifeline companies to quickly match that service and begin offering recipients more bang for their government buck.

Rosiak implies that TracFone (and, by association, all other Lifeline providers) is ripping off the public:

The firm has refused to tell regulators how much it actually costs to provide service, and the industry paints its involvement in the program as being altruistic.

The Washington Times prides itself on being unabashedly conservative.

Here’s what Wikipedia has to say about the Times:

In a 2008 essay published in Harper’s Magazine, historian Thomas Frank linked the Times to the modern American conservative movement, saying:

There is even a daily newspaper—the Washington Times—published strictly for the movement’s benefit, a propaganda sheet whose distortions are so obvious and so alien that it puts one in mind of those official party organs one encounters when traveling in authoritarian countries.[53]

In 2009 the New York Times reported:

With its conservative editorial bent, the paper also became a crucial training ground for many rising conservative journalists and a must-read for those in the movement. A veritable who’s who of conservatives — Tony Blankley, Frank J. Gaffney Jr., Larry Kudlow, John Podhoretz and Tony Snow — has churned out copy for its pages.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times

Is it really the position of a conservative publication that a private company doing business with a non-governmental agency should have to reveal its most vital financial data to the government and, therefore, to its most bitter competitors?

Certainly, that seems contradictory to everything we think we know about conservative philosophy. But we fear that this is one of those sad cases where the Times has allowed its visceral hatred of the Lifeline program to overrule its most basic political philosophy.

Would the Times feel the same way if a regulator demanded that it reveal its finances, its costs of doing business, its profits and losses.

We doubt it.

There is a lot to criticize about Lifeline Assistance, the free government cell phone program. FreeGovernmentCellPhones.net has often criticized the lax regulation and rampant fraud present in this otherwise incredibly worthwhile program.

In the future, we hope that Luke Rosiak and the Washington Times focus on the real problems with the program and stop their sensational attacks on aspects of the program that are undeserving of those attacks.

Tagged as: Safelink Wireless, Tracfone

Want more news from Free Government Cell Phones?

Click here and we'll drop you a line when new articles are up.

Comments

  1. wendy franzen says

    October 31, 2014 at 8:52 pm

    How come, homeless people, cannot receive a phone???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

  2. kerry.linthicum says

    October 31, 2014 at 7:51 pm

    I’ve tried in vain (online, phone contacts, and via USPS) to help a friend receiving Medicaid assistance obtain free cell phone minutes via SafeLink. All verifications were submitted as instructed, however, they seem not to want to approve the application because they cannot verify her resident address. Initial customer service rep informed me that the applicants resident address is not valid and/or requires an apartment number (not exact words.). I am the owner of the home where the applicant resides. It seems SafeLink customer service (? in India) does not have the knowledge nor the resources to verify resident address in Hawaii. And denying approval of the free cell phone minutes via Safelink even though verifications (letter from her caseworker, certified mail, register mail) have been sent to them timely. Will try another phone service soon.

  3. Terry says

    October 31, 2014 at 8:20 am

    I always enjoy reading the various articles that you publish in support of this program which I support and promote in our agency. I would offer a suggestion regarding using Wikipedia. “Don’t”. Wikipedia can be wildly inaccurate and can be skewed in many different ways because of how the information is gathered. It is so unreliable that a large percentage of Colleges and Universities in the United States will not allow students to quote it as a resource for papers or any other works. There are too many other resources available on the web without having to resort to using resources of dubious or questionable accuracy. I am not arguing that you are wrong regarding the Washington Post, only that many will disregard your information when you use Wikipedia as a resource.

Previous Post: How to get a free government cell phone in California
Next Post: California news: Budget Mobile now offering free government cell phones with unlimited talk and unlimited text

Just tell me how to get a Phone!

Confused? Getting a phone is actually very simple. Click here to begin, read every word, and then simply follow the instructions.

Sign up for our Free Newsletter

Click to learn more...

Search this site

More Information

  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Readers' Questions
  • Help
  • Contact
  • About Us

Recent Articles

Q Link busted again: FCC proposes $62,000,000 fine for ACP “fraud”

Horrifying: California giving food stamps to undocumented migrants, taking free government cell phones away from citizens and legal residents

11 things you need to know about the new Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP)

Q Link Wireless raided by FBI, IRS, US Post Office, Sheriffs

Limited time only: Free unlimited talk, unlimited text AND unlimited data

Q Link F ups continue: Company makes it easy to access private customer info

Were our readers right? Are free government cell phones hacked before they’re activated?

Crisis in free government cell phone program: Will new demands kill off service providers?

WTF? Assist Wireless screws up, exposes tens of thousands of customer IDs

Number of free government cell phone customers drops by two million in last three years

Latest Reader Comments

  • Free Government Cell Phones on Assurance Wireless Free Cell Phones: “Thousands of people visit this website every single day, Dolores. Unfortunately, we do not have the manpower (or woman power)…” Jan 3, 15:33
  • Kathy Ivey on Safelink Wireless Free Cell Phones: “I am just thankful for the service and the government place this program however I have had data stolen was…” Jan 2, 15:25
  • I am so frustrated with not having a phone please look into this . You cannot email me or text me I have no phone on Assurance Wireless Free Cell Phones: “I have been an assurance wireless customer for many many years recently actually 15 days ago my cell phone died…” Jan 1, 05:26
  • Free Government Cell Phones on 11 things you need to know about the new Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP): “That article was never intended to the the be-all and end-all of Lifeline, Melissa. Try clicking around the rest of…” Dec 29, 16:25
  • Melissa Vertrees on 11 things you need to know about the new Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP): “This was no help in me getting a phone!” Dec 25, 21:53
  • Free Government Cell Phones on 11 things you need to know about the new Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP): “We assume you’re going to need to help him with the application. Correct? Which provider and plan to choose? You…” Dec 15, 14:03
  • Free Government Cell Phones on How to file a Lifeline Service Complaint: “All that information is in the article on this page.” Dec 15, 14:02
  • Free Government Cell Phones on 11 things you need to know about the new Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP): “You need to select a service provider in your state and then contact that provider to enroll. Which provider and…” Dec 15, 14:02
  • Free Government Cell Phones on Safelink Wireless Free Cell Phones: “We are not Safelink, Leroy. This is an independent informational website and we do not provide phones. You need to…” Dec 15, 14:01
  • Free Government Cell Phones on TruConnect free phones, minutes and texts in California and Texas: “We can tell you everything you need to know, Lawrence. Which provider and plan to choose? You can find all…” Dec 15, 14:01
Copyright 2022 FreeGovernmentCellPhones.net. | Privacy Policy | Contact